Skip to content
Salesforce

A Salesforce AI roadmap built on value, not demos

We score where AI actually pays off in your CRM, from lead scoring to knowledge answers, then sequence twelve months of work with a metric and an estimate for every step.

  • 2–4 week engagement
  • Five use cases scored on your data
  • Agentforce or external LLMs, chosen per case
  • A baseline metric before any build
Who this is for

For teams who have seen the demo and now need the plan

Salesforce ships AI features every release, and your board has asked what you are doing with them. The honest answer depends on your data, your licences and where your people lose time. A roadmap gives you that answer in writing, with numbers.

Typical situations

  • Sales leadership wants "AI in the CRM" and IT wants to know what that costs
  • Agentforce has been quoted, and nobody can say which use case would justify it
  • A pilot chatbot went live, impressed nobody, and quietly died
  • You already run AI elsewhere and want it inside Salesforce without a second data silo

What you get

  • Five use cases scored for value and effort on your own data and licences
  • A build-or-buy call per use case: Agentforce, Einstein, or an external model
  • A twelve-month sequence with pilots, gates and a metric for each step
  • A governance line: who approves, what data each feature may read, how it is evaluated
Where AI pays off

Five use cases that earn their place in a CRM

Each card states what the feature does, what it needs from your data, and the number we use to judge it. If the number cannot be measured today, the first task is to measure it.

Lead scoring

Ranks inbound leads by likelihood to convert from history and firmographics. Needs twelve months of won and lost leads with consistent fields. Metric: conversion rate of top-decile leads versus the rest.

Case summarisation

Condenses long case threads and call transcripts so agents and managers read in seconds. Needs case history and email-to-case. Metric: handle time and wrap-up time per case.

Next-best-action

Recommends the next step on an account or case from signals and rules. Needs clean stage data, logged activity and a feedback loop. Metric: acceptance rate, then win rate on accepted actions.

Email drafting

Drafts replies and follow-ups in your tone, grounded in the record. Needs templates, tone guidance and a human review step. Metric: first-response time and edits per draft.

Knowledge answers

Answers agent and customer questions from your knowledge base with citations. Needs a curated knowledge base, retrieval (RAG) and access control. Metric: deflection rate and accuracy on an evaluation set.

Prioritisation

Prioritise by value and effort, on your numbers

Value is time saved, revenue influenced and risk reduced. Effort is data readiness, licences, integration work and governance. We score both in a workshop with the people who own the numbers, then plot the result.

Illustrative prioritisation matrix: five CRM AI use cases plotted by value against effort, with case summarisation and email drafting in the do-first quadrant, knowledge answers, lead scoring and next-best-action in plan-properly, and two common requests in the lower quadrants Value against effort Illustrative placement, re-scored on your data DO FIRST PLAN PROPERLY FILL-INS DEFER Case summarisation Email drafting Knowledge answers (RAG) Lead scoring Next-best-action Generic CRM chatbot Autonomous deal-closing agent High value Low value Value: time saved, revenue, risk Low effort High effort Effort: data readiness, licences, integration, governance
Illustrative placement. The two grey items are requests we hear often and usually advise against until the orange and teal ones are live. Your plot will differ; that is the point of scoring it.
Build or buy

Agentforce and Einstein, or an external model

Neither answer is right for every use case. The questions below decide it per feature; the usual result is both, with Agentforce in the console and an MCP or RAG service behind it. The reasoning is spelled out in Salesforce and LLMs.

QuestionLean Agentforce / EinsteinLean external LLM via our services
Where does the data live?Mostly inside Salesforce or Data CloudSpread across CRM, ERP, documents and ticketing
Who uses the feature?Reps and agents inside SalesforceCustomers, partners and other applications too
How much model control do you need?Platform-managed models and Trust Layer are enoughYou need model choice, evaluation sets or fine-tuning
What is the cost shape?Licence and per-conversation add-ons are acceptableToken usage on your own infrastructure is cheaper at your volume
Who audits it?Platform guardrails and logs satisfy your policyYou need your own guardrails and audit trail (see AI security)
Twelve months

An illustrative twelve-month sequence

Foundations first, then the low-effort wins, then the use cases that need a year of clean data. Every quarter ends with a gate where a pilot either scales or stops.

Illustrative twelve-month Salesforce AI roadmap: foundations in quarter one, case summaries from quarter one to two, email drafting in quarter two, knowledge answers across quarters two and three, lead scoring in quarter three, next-best-action in quarter four, with pilot and scale gates Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Foundations data, consent, governance Case summaries Email drafting Knowledge answers Lead scoring Next-best-action Pilot go/no-go Scale decision
Bars show build and pilot windows; a use case that fails its gate is paused, not pushed. Lead scoring starts only once a year of consistent outcome data exists.
  1. Quarter 1

    Foundations and the first pilot

    Data readiness fixes, consent flags, a governance line and evaluation sets. Case summarisation piloted in one queue with baseline metrics captured two weeks before switch-on.

  2. Quarter 2

    Scale the win, add the second

    Summarisation to every queue. Email drafting with a mandatory review step. Knowledge base curation starts, and the retrieval service is built and evaluated offline.

  3. Quarter 3

    Knowledge and scoring

    Knowledge answers live for agents first, then for customers behind deflection metrics. Lead scoring trained on twelve months of outcomes and compared with the reps' own ranking.

  4. Quarter 4

    Next-best-action and the year-two plan

    Recommendations in the console with a feedback loop. Monthly evaluation runs continue. The roadmap is re-scored with a year of real numbers.

Measurement

How we know it worked

Baseline

Two to four weeks of the metric before anything changes, captured from Salesforce reports the team already trusts. No baseline, no build.

Pilot

One team or queue for four to six weeks, with a comparison group where the volume allows. The gate is a number agreed in advance, not a demo.

Ongoing evaluation

A fixed evaluation set re-run monthly for accuracy and cost per outcome. The method is described in measuring AI ROI.

Not sure where you stand?

The free AI readiness assessment takes ten minutes and gives a first view of data, skills and governance gaps. Bring the result to the roadmap workshop, or use it to decide whether a workshop is worth it yet. For AI beyond the CRM, start with AI strategy.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Do we need Agentforce or Data Cloud licences before we start?

No. The roadmap tells you which licences each use case needs, and where an external model behind an MCP or RAG service is the better fit. Several use cases run on your existing edition plus our services; others genuinely need the platform add-ons.

How long does the roadmap engagement take?

Two to four weeks: one week of data and org discovery, a scoring workshop with sales, service and IT, then a written roadmap with a metric and an estimate band per use case. Larger orgs with several business units take the longer end.

Which use case should most teams start with?

Usually case summarisation or email drafting. The data already exists, the risk is low because a human still sends the message, and the metric (handle time, first-response time) is already measured. Lead scoring needs twelve months of clean outcome data first.

Can you build what is in the roadmap?

Yes. Agentforce and Einstein configuration, Apex and LWC, integrations, and the retrieval and MCP services that connect Salesforce to external models are all delivered by the same team that wrote the roadmap.

How do you handle governance and the EU AI Act?

Each use case gets a risk classification, a data-access boundary and an evaluation set before it ships. The approach follows our AI governance practice, and the roadmap flags any use case that would fall under EU AI Act obligations.

What data do we need in place?

Consistent stage and status fields, activity logging that reps actually do, consent flags on contacts, and a knowledge base somebody curates. The discovery week measures each of these; see our guide to data readiness for AI.

Ready to make AI work in production?

Tell us about your systems, your data and your constraints. We reply within one business day with a straight answer and a suggested next step.